There is no shortage of brilliant, awe-inspiring, and thoughtful books in the world. Some leave such a profound impact on us that we think about them for the rest of our lives, and each time we go back to that book, the experience is new and fresh for us because our perception of the content that we read also changes as we grow and change through time. Adding that to your book review may make it robust and captivating.
To write a powerful book review, you must first evaluate the content you have read in an objective, unbiased manner. Anything can be reviewed, be it a movie, article, or anything. So, naturally, a book review also possible.
What Must I Keep in Mind While Writing a Review?
You must critically evaluate the text and point out its salient features and flaws in an objective manner. When you are reviewing a book, it must make a solid and valid argument. You must give a summary of it, but you must also provide commentary on it. That’s the most critical aspect of it. You can somewhat enter into a discussion with the author of the book by yourself, offering advice where you see fit.
You must form good and valid opinions on it, giving praise for wherever you feel it does good and professionally pointing out places where it is lacking, all the while offering a critique on it. You must also write a brief description of the author, such as who they are and what they are known for, and mention his other works as well, so his areas of expertise could be determined.
An author’s nationality, biography, intellectual interests, social standing, the time and place where they were born can provide essential details about their chosen subject and topic of writing and why it matters. An example would be, does the author’s poverty or richness matter in what they are writing? An example would be Karl Marx, who experienced great difficulty in his life, both in poverty and societal issues.
Thanks to that, he was compelled to write his Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital. This way, you can compare one work to an author’s other works and look upon his strengths and weaknesses as a writer.
Your review must follow a proper format – it should have a thesis statement, a supporting body containing your discussion and arguments, and finally, a conclusion. It should not have to be very long, and typically, a book review is about 1000 words, though there are instances where it is longer. While different types of studies may contain variations, they hold certain similarities.
Similarities Between Various Review Types
- Carrying a concise summary of the book or topic being reviewed. This includes an overall description along with your perspective or opinion, an argument, and reasoning.
- Next, it contains a critical analysis or evaluation of the content, which includes what stood out to you in the book, what could be improved upon and how it helped improve your notions on the subject.
- Lastly, along with an analysis, the review gives their honest thoughts about whether the readers would appreciate it or not. Of course, this may be subjective, but you have to be open-minded, unbiased, and objective. You must draw from your own experiences and thought process, as well as take inference from literary works you’ve already read to establish what is and isn’t superior or inferior and highlight where the book wins or loses.
You must also bear in mind the period in which the book was written. For example, if you are going to review Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, you must be aware of the notion that it is a 19th-century literary piece of work. You have to put up comparisons with possibly contemporary works to draw up a contract if you are writing a comparative study while observing and analyzing how things have changed regarding social issues and norms.
How Do I Write a Convincing Argument?
The above-given formatting and advice are merely written to help you formulate a proper structure for your review. In actuality, at its core, it is only a two-step process: figuring out and developing an argument about the work and a support basis for that argument in the form of your writing. To do this clearly and rationally, you can ask yourself a series of questions such as:
- What is the main argument (or thesis statement) of the book? What is the book trying to accomplish? Has the author drawing inspiration from other works?
- What is the topic or subject around which the book revolves? How does the author approach the subject? Is it done in a balanced, objective manner? Has he managed to convince the readers? Is he looking at all sides of the issue?
- In what way is the author supporting his argument? What are the proof and evidence for the conclusions towards which they reached? Is there anything conflicting about the work with some other work that you have come across elsewhere?
- In what manner does the author structure his argument? Is it a sensible argument? Does it successfully convince the readers? Does it fail? If so, then in what way?
- Has the book helped you gain clarity or further understanding of the subject at hand? Can it be recommended to others? How complex and simplistic is the content being written, and how successful have they been in getting their point across?
Categorizing the Book
Another essential thing to remain aware of is the genre in which the book is being written. A genre is any style or category of a literary piece such as thriller, horror, romance, social issues, fiction, nonfiction, children’s, young adult, historical, scientific, etc. Once you’ve looked upon the book genre, you can identify what conventions of the current work in the same category does it adhere to.
Does it go against the pre-existing positions and arguments? Is it correctly categorized? Does it meet the usual standards of its genre? Such as, in the category of fantasy, is it merely a stereotypical copy-paste of other great works, or does it introduce something new as well? If it’s an entirely new genre, it would be best to mention that in your career.
Beginning to Write
Once it is time to start writing the work, you must ensure that you have thoroughly analyzed every aspect. Also, make sure you have made notes of the book and material which is to be covered and inferred to. Make your assessments and observations, compare everything to your messages.
Figure other sources with your notes and refer to the well-known materials of the genre and begin. First, you must write a thesis statement that manages to compile everything you have come across into a piece of singular, comprehensive information to give the reader an idea of what they will be reading about. After this, you must provide an outline that supports your argument or thesis statement.
Make sure your argument is sound and logical, without any holes. If there are holes, you must identify them beforehand and give logical reasoning or a basis for their relevance and existence. Contrary to how formal academic writing is done, in this circumstance, it is not abnormal to first present the author’s argument before your own. So, if you are following that format, that’s also correct.
Your review must emphasize the nature of the study – if the work in itself is more significant, then you should infer an author’s biographical details as well as the written text itself. If the review primarily focuses on your thoughts and opinions, you must structure it so that your observations run sideways with the work itself, but it can favor your arguments. Ultimately, it directly depends on how you want to pursue it.
When reviewers tend to add a quote or a clever quip at the start for entertainment, the article is too brief. However, this is not necessary.
- You can start as you prefer, but the starting paragraph must contain the author’s name, the book’s title, and the central theme of the book.
- You can also establish a link between the subject matter and the title and explain how they correlate.
- You must give the context of the book and your review. Putting your check-in in an appropriate framework helps the readers understand your take on it. The context you give determines your argument’s direction and informs your readers.
- The thesis of the book itself, as well as what contribution it is trying to make. Its angle, originality, or novelty. What is the author trying to do?
- Your written thesis about the book.
Keep this brief as your analysis is what’s most important. Furthermore, since you will be using snippets of the book to substantiate your case and argument, the Summary will be interspersed with other content throughout the racial profiling book.
The Summary also depends on your audience. If new readers are reading it, you may want to make it somewhat more comprehensive, but if the target audience is those who have already read it, you can stick to discussing the finer nuances and details too.
How Do I Evaluate?
Your analysis and evaluation must be broken down into paragraphs, with each section discussing a single argument. This approach can help you organize and categorize your thoughts and give an overall neater look and easier reading for the readers with a better flow. You don’t necessarily have to go in the chronological order of arguments presented in the book, depending on the argument you wish to make. You can also categorize it by theme, methods, or any other element. If you want to include comparisons to other books:
- Keep them brief because the book being discussed should be in the spotlight.
- Avoid too many quotations, but when you do, make sure to mention the page of reference in a bracket.
- Keep in your mind that you don’t have to do unnecessary things – you can also use your own words to put forth what the author has said.
Writing the Conclusion
Sum up your argument and give the final judgment with the concluding thoughts. Do not introduce new evidence or content here. The place for them is the main body. You can submit new ideas that serve as an extension of the book’s themes or your logical argument.
It would be best if you balanced out the strengths and weaknesses of the book and your paper to strengthen your argument. How does everything add up, and how do they stand parallel to one another? What measures could have been done to improve upon the work, or what new directions could have been taken?
Reviewing the Review
Avoid notions like wishful thinking while writing. Keep the book in front of you when writing the review, and make sure it’s the book itself, not the book you wished the author would write. Offer a critique, point out its shortcomings and problems but not in a manner that deviates from what the book was trying to state.
Use precise and acceptable language, and avoid going tangent. The author worked hard on his book, and you should also work hard on your review to give a fair analysis.
Make sure you are giving a fair and balanced argument. Ultimately, the goodness or badness may also be subjective, but you must bear in mind that you can’t just go on pointing out only the negative features. Positive points must also be looked up, if for nothing else than to identify that better book exist.
Finally, read up on other reviews. This will help you develop your argument more clearly. You will have an idea of what to do, and reading others’ reviews will help you move forward.